Work evidence

Proof should show the work, not decorate it.

QuickFix Creative publishes work through reviewed evidence: screenshots, public crawl notes, implementation context, and claims that can be backed up.

Send a page to review See audit method

Evidence standards

The work route is designed as a proof ledger. Raw evidence is captured and reviewed before it becomes public-facing material.

Raw evidence stays private first

Screenshots, crawl output, notes, and draft findings are reviewed before anything becomes public-facing.

Claims need a source

A project note must point back to a screenshot, crawl finding, implementation detail, or reviewed client-approved context.

Public proof stays practical

Published work should show what changed, why it mattered, and what evidence supports the decision.

How project proof is built

The workflow is intentionally plain: capture the evidence, find the friction, document what changed, and publish only what can be supported.

Capture

Collect desktop, tablet, and mobile screenshots plus public crawl data where appropriate.

Review

Check first-screen clarity, CTA hierarchy, contact paths, trust signals, and mobile flow.

Annotate

Record the friction, supporting evidence, recommended fix, and public-safe wording.

Publish

Show only reviewed screenshots, concise context, and claims that can be backed up.

Captured evidence from this build

These screenshots are public-safe because they document the QuickFix Creative preview itself. They prove the evidence system exists; they do not claim client outcomes.

Work evidence route

The deployed work route now presents the evidence standards, proof workflow, raw-reference review states, and before/after method.

public-safe

Mobile screenshot of the QuickFix Creative work evidence route. — Mobile - opens full screenshot

Desktop screenshot of the QuickFix Creative work evidence route. — Desktop - opens full screenshot

Source: Railway preview screenshots and crawl file: evidence/crawls/audits/2026-05-26-qfc-work-railway.md

Audit evidence route

The deployed audit route shows the issue, evidence, severity, and fix-path structure used to keep findings practical.

public-safe

Mobile screenshot of the QuickFix Creative audit evidence route. — Mobile - opens full screenshot

Desktop screenshot of the QuickFix Creative audit evidence route. — Desktop - opens full screenshot

Source: Railway preview screenshots and crawl file: evidence/crawls/audits/2026-05-26-qfc-audits-railway.md

Claim ledger

Public statements are limited to what the captured evidence can actually support.

Responsive evidence captured

validated

The work and audit routes have screenshots captured at mobile, tablet, and desktop widths.

Source: evidence/screenshots/public-safe/mobile, evidence/screenshots/public-safe/tablet, and evidence/screenshots/public-safe/desktop

Route content crawled

validated

The deployed /work and /audits route content was extracted from the Railway preview for review.

Source: evidence/crawls/audits/2026-05-26-qfc-work-railway.md and evidence/crawls/audits/2026-05-26-qfc-audits-railway.md

Reference projects remain claim-limited

raw captured

Public reference URLs have raw screenshots and crawl files, but no outcomes, testimonials, or client approval are published from them.

Source: evidence/screenshots/raw and evidence/crawls/portfolio

External references reviewed

reviewed

The external reference review now separates approved observable UX patterns from held or rejected outcome claims.

Source: Phase 9 external reference review and evidence/crawls/portfolio

Public-safe operational case studies

These entries document implementation work that has a clear artifact trail. They stay narrow on purpose: what existed, what changed, why it mattered, and what evidence supports it.

Work evidence route: placeholder to proof ledger

public-safe

What existed

The /work route at commit 50c3299 was a single shell page describing future evidence.

Issue identified

The route stated the evidence policy, but it did not yet show captured proof, reviewed claims, or an operational evidence flow.

QuickFix

Added evidence standards, public-safe screenshots, raw-reference capture states, a claim ledger, and before/after implementation comparisons.

Why it matters

A visitor can now see how QuickFix Creative handles proof before being asked to trust portfolio claims.

Evidence

Git source at commit 50c3299
Railway /work screenshots at 390, 768, and 1440 widths
evidence/crawls/audits/2026-05-26-qfc-work-railway.md
Phase 7 deployment validation

Claim boundary

This proves the evidence system exists. It does not claim client results, conversion lift, or approval from referenced projects.

Audit route: method made visible

public-safe

What existed

The /audits route explained the Conversion Killer Audit method and evidence recording structure.

Issue identified

The route needed a public-safe way to show that the audit system itself had been captured and reviewed.

QuickFix

Added a current audit-route evidence ledger that maps public claims to the captured /audits crawl and Railway screenshots.

Why it matters

The audit offer now demonstrates its own discipline: issues need evidence, severity, and a practical fix path.

Evidence

Railway /audits screenshots at 390, 768, and 1440 widths
evidence/crawls/audits/2026-05-26-qfc-audits-railway.md
Phase 7 claim review
Railway preview deployment validation

Claim boundary

No Lighthouse scores, performance claims, conversion improvements, or client outcomes are published.

Reference capture workflow: evidence before portfolio

claim-limited

What existed

Four public reference URLs were listed as queued for evidence review.

Issue identified

Listing URLs without captured artifacts risks turning portfolio structure into unsupported proof.

QuickFix

Captured mobile and desktop screenshots plus crawl markdown for each reference URL, then kept them marked raw-captured until review.

Why it matters

The workflow shows operational discipline: evidence can exist without becoming a public claim too early.

Evidence

evidence/crawls/portfolio/2026-05-26-ref-truview-glass.md
evidence/crawls/portfolio/2026-05-26-ref-celia-dunsmore.md
evidence/crawls/portfolio/2026-05-26-ref-tradiepayau.md
evidence/crawls/portfolio/2026-05-26-ref-golden-pour.md

Claim boundary

These are not client case studies yet. No testimonials, outcomes, client approval, or performance claims are published.

External reference review: observations without outcome claims

public-safe observation

What existed

Four external reference pages had raw crawls and local raw screenshots captured for review.

Issue identified

Raw evidence can accidentally look like client proof if the approval state and claim boundary are not explicit.

QuickFix

Reviewed each reference, promoted only direct observations, and recorded rejected or held claims separately from approved notes.

Why it matters

The work route can show evidence discipline without implying client approval, ownership, metrics, or outcomes.

Evidence

evidence/crawls/portfolio/2026-05-26-ref-truview-glass.md
evidence/crawls/portfolio/2026-05-26-ref-golden-pour.md
evidence/crawls/portfolio/2026-05-26-ref-tradiepayau.md
evidence/crawls/portfolio/2026-05-26-ref-celia-dunsmore.md
Local raw screenshots reviewed at mobile and desktop widths

Claim boundary

This is a public-safe review workflow entry. It does not claim client approval, QuickFix ownership, before/after results, or measurable business impact.

Case-study claim decisions

The public case-study system records what can be said now and what stays held until better evidence exists.

Approved

approved

QuickFix Creative has public-safe screenshots and crawl evidence for its own /work and /audits routes.

Source: Phase 7 screenshot and crawl artifacts.

Approved

approved

The /work route evolved from a shell page into an evidence ledger with claim boundaries and public-safe screenshots.

Source: Git commit 50c3299, current route source, and /work crawl.

Rejected

rejected

The reference projects produced measurable conversion, performance, revenue, or trust outcomes.

Source: No reviewed metric artifact or approved client outcome exists.

Held

pending review

The reference projects are client-approved public case studies.

Source: Raw screenshots and crawls exist, but approval context is not recorded.

Approved

approved

External reference pages can support narrow observations about visible UX, CTA, trust, and contact-path structure.

Source: Phase 9 review promoted only direct observations with explicit claim boundaries.

Approved external reference observations

These are observations from public pages, not client case studies. Each note is limited to what the crawl and screenshots can directly support.

TruView Glass

approved observation

The captured page presents the emergency glass repair offer, direct phone/photo quote paths, and local trust signals in the first-screen and crawl evidence.

Source: Readable mobile/desktop raw screenshots plus evidence/crawls/portfolio/2026-05-26-ref-truview-glass.md. No client approval, ownership, outcomes, review authenticity, or performance claims are made.

Golden Pour

approved observation

The captured page makes the venue name, opening time, address, taplist path, and directions path visible in the first-screen and crawl evidence.

Source: Readable mobile/desktop raw screenshots plus evidence/crawls/portfolio/2026-05-26-ref-golden-pour.md. No traffic, booking, sales, ownership, or client approval claims are made.

TradiePayAU

claim-limited

The captured page uses a calculator-first flow, provider comparison path, trade-specific entry points, and visible verification/ABN signals.

Source: Readable mobile/desktop raw screenshots plus evidence/crawls/portfolio/2026-05-26-ref-tradiepayau.md. Crawl-visible data issues remain internal review notes; no data accuracy, revenue, affiliate, or conversion claims are made.

Celia Dunsmore Counselling

validation pending

The crawl captures counselling credentials, Medicare rebate information, service categories, and contact-oriented site structure, but the raw screenshots captured only a loading state.

Source: evidence/crawls/portfolio/2026-05-26-ref-celia-dunsmore.md plus loading-state raw screenshots. Not promoted as visual public proof until a readable screenshot is captured and reviewed.

External reference claim decisions

The review separates what can be said now from claims that stay held or rejected until better evidence exists.

Approved

approved

It is public-safe to say the external reference pages were reviewed for observable UX, trust, CTA, and contact-path patterns.

Source: Phase 9 raw screenshot and crawl review.

Approved

approved

TruView Glass, Golden Pour, and TradiePayAU have readable raw screenshot evidence plus crawl files supporting narrow observational notes.

Source: Local raw screenshot review and evidence/crawls/portfolio artifacts.

Held

validation pending

Celia Dunsmore Counselling can be used as visual public proof.

Source: The crawl has useful content, but both raw screenshots show a loading state.

Rejected

rejected

Any external reference produced measurable conversion, revenue, performance, enquiry, or trust outcomes.

Source: No reviewed metric artifact exists.

Rejected

rejected

External references are client-approved QuickFix Creative case studies.

Source: No approval context is recorded.

Reference examples are still claim-limited.

Screenshots and crawl notes now exist for each reference URL. Reviewed observations can be public-safe, but outcomes, ownership, testimonials, and client approval remain unclaimed.

TruView Glass

Mobile and desktop screenshots plus crawl markdown captured. Pending reviewed case-study context.

raw captured

https://truview.glass

Raw source: evidence/crawls/portfolio/2026-05-26-ref-truview-glass.md

Celia Dunsmore Counselling

Mobile and desktop screenshots plus crawl markdown captured. Pending reviewed case-study context.

raw captured

https://celiadunsmorecounselling.com.au

Raw source: evidence/crawls/portfolio/2026-05-26-ref-celia-dunsmore.md

TradiePayAU

Mobile and desktop screenshots plus crawl markdown captured. Pending reviewed case-study context.

raw captured

https://tradiepayau.directory

Raw source: evidence/crawls/portfolio/2026-05-26-ref-tradiepayau.md

Golden Pour

Mobile and desktop screenshots plus crawl markdown captured. Pending reviewed case-study context.

raw captured

https://goldenpourdev.up.railway.app/

Raw source: evidence/crawls/portfolio/2026-05-26-ref-golden-pour.md

Real before and after evidence from this build

The comparison is about operational maturity: what changed, which artifact supports it, and what can now be safely said.

Before

The /work route at commit 50c3299 was a single shell page describing future evidence.

Evidence

Git source at 50c3299 plus the captured /work crawl from the Railway preview.

After

The deployed /work route now shows evidence standards, proof workflow, raw-capture states, and public-safe comparison rules.

Before

Reference projects were listed as pending review without captured artifacts.

Evidence

Mobile and desktop screenshots plus crawl markdown were captured for the four public reference URLs on 2026-05-26.

After

The projects can now be marked as raw captured while staying out of public proof claims until reviewed.

Before

The audit route explained evidence discipline mostly as a method.

Evidence

Railway screenshots at 390, 768, and 1440 widths plus the captured /audits crawl.

After

The audit method now has traceable route evidence without claiming client results or performance gains.